:Influencing factors and prediction of ambient Peroxyacetyl nitrate concentration in Beijing,China论文

:Influencing factors and prediction of ambient Peroxyacetyl nitrate concentration in Beijing,China论文

本文主要研究内容

作者(2019)在《Influencing factors and prediction of ambient Peroxyacetyl nitrate concentration in Beijing,China》一文中研究指出:Peroxyacyl nitrates(PANs) are important secondary pollutants in ground-level atmosphere.Accurate prediction of atmospheric pollutant concentrations is crucial to guide effective precautions for before and during specific pollution events. In this study, four models based on the back-propagation(BP) artificial neural network(ANN) and multiple linear regression(MLR) methods were used to predict the hourly average PAN concentrations at Peking University, Beijing, in 2014. The model inputs were atmospheric pollutant data and meteorological parameters. Model 3 using a BP-ANN based on the original variables achieved the best prediction results among the four models, with a correlation coefficient(R) of 0.7089, mean bias error of -0.0043 ppb, mean absolute error of 0.4836?ppb, root mean squared error of 0.5320?ppb, and Willmott’s index of agreement of 0.8214. Based on a comparison of the performance indices of the MLR and BP-ANN models, we concluded that the BP-ANN model was able to capture the highly non-linear relationships between PAN concentration and the conventional atmospheric pollutant and meteorological parameters,providing more accurate results than the traditional MLR models did, with a markedly higher goodness of R. The selected meteorological and atmospheric pollutant parameters described a sufficient amount of PAN variation, and thus provided satisfactory prediction results. More specifically, the BP-ANN model performed very well for capturing the variation pattern when PAN concentrations were low. The findings of this study address some of the existing knowledge gaps in this research field and provide a theoretical basis for future regional air pollution control.

Abstract

Peroxyacyl nitrates(PANs) are important secondary pollutants in ground-level atmosphere.Accurate prediction of atmospheric pollutant concentrations is crucial to guide effective precautions for before and during specific pollution events. In this study, four models based on the back-propagation(BP) artificial neural network(ANN) and multiple linear regression(MLR) methods were used to predict the hourly average PAN concentrations at Peking University, Beijing, in 2014. The model inputs were atmospheric pollutant data and meteorological parameters. Model 3 using a BP-ANN based on the original variables achieved the best prediction results among the four models, with a correlation coefficient(R) of 0.7089, mean bias error of -0.0043 ppb, mean absolute error of 0.4836?ppb, root mean squared error of 0.5320?ppb, and Willmott’s index of agreement of 0.8214. Based on a comparison of the performance indices of the MLR and BP-ANN models, we concluded that the BP-ANN model was able to capture the highly non-linear relationships between PAN concentration and the conventional atmospheric pollutant and meteorological parameters,providing more accurate results than the traditional MLR models did, with a markedly higher goodness of R. The selected meteorological and atmospheric pollutant parameters described a sufficient amount of PAN variation, and thus provided satisfactory prediction results. More specifically, the BP-ANN model performed very well for capturing the variation pattern when PAN concentrations were low. The findings of this study address some of the existing knowledge gaps in this research field and provide a theoretical basis for future regional air pollution control.

论文参考文献

  • [1].A Research for Regional Contribution Rate of Internal Source and External Source of PM2.5 Based on Set Pair Analysis Method[J]. Zhou Yejing,Zhou Jingxuan,Xiao Renbin.  Meteorological and Environmental Research.2016(02)
  • [2].A land use regression model incorporating data on industrial point source pollution[J]. Li Chen1, Yuming Wang1, Peiwu Li1, Yaqin Ji2,3, Shaofei Kong2,3, Zhiyong Li2,3, Zhipeng Bai4 1. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Tianjin normal University, Tianjin 300387, China 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China 3. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution and Control, Tianjin 300071, China 4. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.  Journal of Environmental Sciences.2012(07)
  • [3].Analysis of Summertime Typical Pollution in Pearl River Delta Region——Numerical Simulation of Meteorological Field[J]. Zhang Xiaochen,Liu Yiming,Deng Xuejiao,Chen Pakwai,Feng Yerong,Fan Qi.  Meteorological and Environmental Research.2014(04)
  • [4].Chemical composition and quantitative relationship between meteorological condition and fine particles in Beijing[J]. WANG Jing-li 1, ZHANG Yuan-hang 2, SHAO Min 2,* , Liu Xu-lin 3, ZENG Li-min 2, CHENG Cong-lan 1, XU Xiao-feng 1 (1.Institute of Urban Meteorology, CMA, Beijing 100089, China. ; 2.State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 3.Beijing Meteorological Information and Network Center, Beijing 100089, China).  Journal of Environmental Sciences.2004(05)
  • [5].The impact of meteorological changes from 2013 to 2017 on PM2.5 mass reduction in key regions in China[J]. Xiaoye ZHANG,Xiangde XU,Yihui DING,Yanju LIU,Hengde ZHANG,Yaqiang WANG,Junting ZHONG.  Science China Earth Sciences.
  • [6].Observations of atmospheric pollutants at Lhasa during 2014-2015: Pollution status and the influence of meteorological factors[J]. Bu Duo,Lulu Cui,Zhenzhen Wang,Rui Li,Liwu Zhang,Hongbo Fu,Jianmin Chen,Huifang Zhang,A.Qiong.  Journal of Environmental Sciences.2018(01)
  • [7].Is Smog a Bolt From the Blue or Made by Man?[J].   Beijing Review.2017(03)
  • [8].Retrospective Evaluation of Radiation Environmental Impact from Normal Operation of CIAE Installation during 2006 to 2014[J]. SONG Wei-jie,CHENG Wei-ya.  Annual Report of China Institute of Atomic Energy.2016(00)
  • [9].Mesoscale meteorological modelling for Hong Kong-application of the MC2 model[J]. Dennis Y.C. Leung 1* , Michal Niewiadomski 2, Robert Benoit+3 (1. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. ; 2.ERM|Hong Kong, Ltd, 3. Recherche en Prvision Numrique, 2121 Route Transcanadienne, Dorval, Quebec, C.  Journal of Environmental Sciences.2002(02)
  • [10].Spatial patterns and effects of air pollution and meteorological factors on hospitalization for chronic lung diseases in Beijing, China[J]. Lin Tian,Chuan Yang,Zijun Zhou,Ziting Wu,Xiaochuan Pan,Archie C.A.Clements.  Science China(Life Sciences).2019(10)
  • 论文详细介绍

    论文作者分别是来自Journal of Environmental Sciences的,发表于刊物Journal of Environmental Sciences2019年03期论文,是一篇关于,Journal of Environmental Sciences2019年03期论文的文章。本文可供学术参考使用,各位学者可以免费参考阅读下载,文章观点不代表本站观点,资料来自Journal of Environmental Sciences2019年03期论文网站,若本站收录的文献无意侵犯了您的著作版权,请联系我们删除。

    标签:;  

    :Influencing factors and prediction of ambient Peroxyacetyl nitrate concentration in Beijing,China论文
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢