导读:本文包含了心理学试验论文开题报告文献综述及选题提纲参考文献，主要关键词:CONSORT,RCT,报告规范,随机对照试验
心理学试验论文文献综述
卢存存,杨楠,柯立鑫,刘明,毕志江[1]（2019）在《社会和心理学干预随机对照试验的报告规范(2018)解读》一文中研究指出随机对照试验(RCT)因其消除偏倚、平衡混杂因素、提高统计学检验的有效性等优点,被公认为是评价干预措施效果的金标准[1],逐渐推广到临床以外的社会和心理学研究领域。社会和心理学干预(SPI)旨在改善身体、心理健康和社会结局,相比临床干预类型复杂多样,并且干预间存在相互作用,结局指标也涉及多个层次(如个人、家庭和社区等)[2]。目前,对于SPI的RCT报告仍然采用RCT报告(本文来源于《中国循证儿科杂志》期刊2019年01期）
王一心[2]（2011）在《图书馆修补装订破旧图书的心理学意义及试验》一文中研究指出对于破损图书的修补工作,过去的认识大多限于保护图书。其实除了这个以公共财产——图书为指向的意义之外,还有以图书馆服务核心——读者为指向的的意义亦即心理学上的意义。试验表明图书外观的改善与借阅率相关联。(本文来源于《图书馆论坛》期刊2011年01期）
阳仁力,杨贤俊[3]（2010）在《试验心理学在标志信息量主观评价中的应用浅析》一文中研究指出本文介绍试验心理学方法,将其应用到道路交通安全评价中,针对目前指路标志信息量过载,驾驶员认知读取信息过程困难的现状,进行试验设计,试验借助3dsmax软件建立动态认知场景,以提高精确性和可操作性。结果表明,试验心理学方法可以应用于道路交通安全评价中。(本文来源于《黑龙江科技信息》期刊2010年03期）
Bellinger,D.C.,Trachtenberg,F.,Barregard,L.,S.,McKinlay,张振[4]（2006）在《牙科汞合金材料对儿童神经心理学和肾脏功能的影响:随机化临床试验》一文中研究指出Context: No randomized trials have been published that address the concern that inhalation of mercury vapor released by amalgam dental restorations causes adverse health effects. Objective: To compare the neuropsychological and renal function of children whose dental caries were restored using amalgam or mercury- free materials. Design and Setting The New England Children' s Amalgam Trial was a 2- group randomized safety trial involving 5 community health dental clinics in Boston, Mass, and 1 in Farmington, Me, between September 1997 and March 2005. Participants and Intervention: A total of 534 children aged 6 to 10 years at baseline with no prior amalgam restorations and 2 or more posterior teeth with caries were randomly assigned to receive dental restoration of baseline and incident caries during a 5- year follow- up period using either amalgam (n=267) or resin composite (n =267) materials. Main Outcome Measures: The primary neuropsychological outcome was 5- year change in fullscale IQ scores. Secondary outcomes included tests of memory and visuomotor ability. Renal glomerular function was measured by creatinine- adjusted albumin in urine. Results: Children had a mean of 15 tooth surfaces (median, 14) restored during the 5- year period (range, 0- 55). Assignment to the amalgam group was associated with a significantly higher mean urinary mercury level (0.9 vs 0.6 μ g/g of creatinine at year 5, P < 0.001). After adjusting for randomization stratum and other covariates, no statistically significant differences were found between children in the amalgam and composite groups in 5- year change in full- scale IQ score (3.1 vs 2.1, P=0.21). The difference in treatment group change scores was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, - 0.6 to 2.5) full- scale IQ score point. No statistically significant differences were found for 4- year change in the general memory index (8.1 vs 7.2, P=0.34), 4- year change in visuomotor composite (3.8 vs 3.7, P=0.93), or year 5 urinary albumin (median, 7.5 vs 7.4 mg/g of creatinine, P=0.61). Conclusions: In this study, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse neuropsychological or renal effects observed over the 5- year period in children whose caries were restored using dental amalgam or composite materials. Although it is possible that very small IQ effects cannot be ruled out, these findings suggest that the health effects of amalgam restorations in children need not be the basis of treatment decisions when choosing restorative dental materials.(本文来源于《世界核心医学期刊文摘(儿科学分册)》期刊2006年10期）
Bellinger,D.C.,Trachtenberg,F.,Barregard,L.,S.,McKinlay,周永[5]（2006）在《牙科银汞合金对儿童神经心理学和肾功能的影响:一项随机临床试验》一文中研究指出Context: No randomized trials have been published that address the concern that inhalation of mercury vapor released by amalgam dental restorations causes adverse health effects. Objective: To compare the neuropsychological and renal function of children whose dental caries were restored using amalgam or mercury-free materials. Design and Setting The New England Children’s Amalgam Trial was a 2-group randomized safety trial involving 5 community health dental clinics in oston, Mass, and 1 in Farmington, Me, between September 1997 and March 2005. Participants and Intervention: A total of 534 children aged 6 to 10 years at baseline with no prior amalgam restorations and 2 or more posterior teeth with caries were randomly assigned to receive dental restoration of baseline and incident caries during a 5-year follow-up period using either amalgam (n=267) or resin composite (n =267) materials. Main Outcome Measures: The primary neuropsychological outcome was 5-year change in full-scale IQ scores. Secondary outcomes included tests of memory and visuomotor ability. Renal glomerular function was measured by creatinine-adjusted albumin in urine. Results: Children had a mean of 15 tooth surfaces (median, 14) restored during the 5-year period (range, 0-55). Assignment to the amalgam group was associated with a significantly higher mean urinary mercury level (0.9 vs 0.6 μg/g of creatinine at year 5, P < .001). After adjusting for randomization stratum and other covariates, no statistically significant differences were found between children in the amalgam and composite groups in 5-year change in full-scale IQ score (3.1 vs 2.1, P=.21). The difference in treatment group change scores was 1.0 (95%confidence interval, -0.6 to 2.5) full-scale IQ score point. No statistically significant differences were found for 4-year change in the general memory index (8.1 vs 7.2, P=.34), 4-year change in visuomotor composite (3.8 vs 3.7, P=.93), or year 5 urinary albumin (median, 7.5 vs 7.4 mg/g of creatinine, P=.61). Conclusions: In this study, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse neuropsychologicalor renal effects observed over the 5-year period in children whose caries were restored using dental amalgam or composite materials. Although it is possible that very small IQ effects cannot be ruled out, these findings suggest that the health effects of amalgam restorations in children need not be the basis of treatment decisions when choosing restorative dental materials.(本文来源于《世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册)》期刊2006年09期）
Jellema,P.,Van,Der,Windt,D.A.W.M.,Van,Der,Horst,H.E.,谢琰臣[6]（2005）在《是否应针对社会心理学预测因素治疗(亚)急性下背部疼痛:来自全科诊所的多中心随机临床试验》一文中研究指出Objective: To compare the effects of a minimal intervention strategy aimed at assessment and modification of psychosocial prognostic factors and usual care for treatment of (sub)acute low back pain in general practice. Design: Cluster randomised clinical trial. Setting: 60 general practitioners in 41 general practices. Participants: 314 patients with nonspecific low back pain of less than 12 weeks’duration, recruited by their general practitioner. Interventions: In the minimal intervention strategy group the general practitioner explored the presence of psychosocial prognostic factors, discussed these factors, set specific goals for reactivation, and provided an educational booklet. The consultation took about 20 minutes. Usual care was not standardised. Main outcome measures: Functional disability (RolandMorris disability questionnaire), perceived recovery, and sick leave because of low back pain assessed at baseline and after 6, 13, 26, and 52 weeks. Results: The dropout rate was 8%in the minimal intervention strategy group and 9%in the usual care group. Multilevel analyses showed no significant differences between the groups on any outcome measure during 12 months of followup in the whole group or in relevant subgroups (patients with high scores on psychosocial measures at baseline or a history of frequent or prolonged low back pain). Conclusion: This study provides no evidence that (Dutch) general practitioners should adopt our new treatment strategy aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors in patients with (sub)acute low back pain. Further research should examine why our new strategy was not more effective than usual care.(本文来源于《世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册)》期刊2005年11期）
杨奇志[7]（2005）在《中国股票市场个体投资者行为研究》一文中研究指出行为金融学是在对现代金融理论的挑战和质疑的背景下产生的,是基于心理学实验结果来分析投资者各种心理特征,并以此来研究投资者的决策行为及其对资产定价的影响。从行为金融学对投资者行为和股票价格波动的分析中看出,投资者的行为是股票价格波动的最关键因素。正是因为现实中绝大部分投资者都是非理性的,他们由于各种心理原因对已知的信息缺乏理解和加工判断能力,从而影响信息的传递导致股价的波动。对于中国股票市场的投资者来说,由于市场发展时间短、市场结构和监管体系等方面的不健全造成投资者的非理性程度非常高,从而在行为金融理论框架下对中国投资者的行为进行研究就显得尤为必要。 本文首先对证券市场投资者行为的研究作了一个较为系统的回顾,之后在行为金融理论的分析框架下,采用国外比较成熟的研究方法——和实证研究方法分析并总结了中国股票市场中投资者的心理偏差和决策行为,并根据行为金融理论提出了一些适合个体投资者的投资策略。 本文对中国股票市场投资者进行的心理学实验发现,在面对风险性选择时,被试具有相似的认知偏差,即存在明显的过度自信、不确定性厌恶心理、损失厌恶心理和锚定心理等。因此可以得出结论,中国的投资者在决策过程中也存在着同国外研究中发现的类似心理偏差。但由于特定的经济和文化环境等因素的不同,中外投资者在心理偏差的程度上还存在着较大的差异。其次,本文采用中国股票市场的数据对投资者过度自信和处置效应两个假设进行了计量检验,发现中国股票市场确实存在着过度自信的情况,并且在上升趋势时期和下降趋势时期投资者的过度自信程度会有所不同。同时发现中国的投资者比美国的投资者具有更强的处置效应,并且不具有美国股票市场中的季节性。这充分显示出了中国股票市场的独特性。 最后,本文选取了反向投资策略、动量投资策略和小盘股投资策略等行为投资策略进行了具体的分析。综合中国股票市场投资的实际特点,我们发现其中某些投资策略具有较好的实用性,可以为中国证券市场的投资者所借鉴,同样也存在一些策略还需要进一步的考虑斟酌。鉴于此,本文认为在不同的市场环境中应该采用不同的投资策略。本文还探讨了个体投资者行为对公司财务活动和政策监管的影响,并发现中国个体投资者的行为偏差确实会发生作用,无论政府还是上市公司在制定政策时,都应该将这方面的因素考虑进去。 本文只是试图对中国股票市场投资者的行为进行初步研究,至于监管政策、信息环境、社会文化等外部因素对投资者行为的影响,以及投资者行为对资产定价的影响等领域,则需要进行更深入的研究。(本文来源于《华东师范大学》期刊2005-04-01）
郑航[8]（2002）在《高师公共心理学课程增设心理实验教学试验研究》一文中研究指出本文对我院公共心理学增设心理实验教学的教学试验效果进行评价 ,其结论是 :增设心理实验教学有助于提高学生学习兴趣、增强学习价值感 ,加深对心理学知识的理解和运用 ;有助于培养学生科研能力 ;对心理学教学大纲的制定有参考价值 ;同时也指出心理实验教学需要不断创设有利条件 ,才能取得教学成效。(本文来源于《青岛大学师范学院学报》期刊2002年01期）
韩绍欣[9]（1992）在《心理学的教学模式及其改革试验》一文中研究指出自70年代美国学者乔尹斯和韦尔《教学模式》一书出版之后,教学模式的研究引起了国内学者的兴趣,目前已成为新的研究课题,这一课题的研究触及到了心理学的教学指导思想的改革;教学模式的改革以及教学方法的改革。现就心理学的教学模式及近年来的改革试验作一初探。(本文来源于《心理学探新》期刊1992年01期）
马谋超,汪培庄[10]（1985）在《心理学的方法学探讨——心理的模糊性及模糊统计试验评注》一文中研究指出本文以实验心理的某些试验模式为范例,初步评注了心理的模糊性及其处理手段—模糊集(合)的含义,同时,对心理的随机性作了相应的说明。其次,解说了模糊统计(或集值统计)的特点及某些实现的具体方法。最后,作了一个初步的比较试验。(本文来源于《心理学报》期刊1985年02期）
心理学试验论文开题报告
（1）论文研究背景及目的
此处内容要求：
首先简单简介论文所研究问题的基本概念和背景，再而简单明了地指出论文所要研究解决的具体问题，并提出你的论文准备的观点或解决方法。
写法范例：
对于破损图书的修补工作,过去的认识大多限于保护图书。其实除了这个以公共财产——图书为指向的意义之外,还有以图书馆服务核心——读者为指向的的意义亦即心理学上的意义。试验表明图书外观的改善与借阅率相关联。
（2）本文研究方法
调查法：该方法是有目的、有系统的搜集有关研究对象的具体信息。
观察法：用自己的感官和辅助工具直接观察研究对象从而得到有关信息。
实验法：通过主支变革、控制研究对象来发现与确认事物间的因果关系。
文献研究法：通过调查文献来获得资料，从而全面的、正确的了解掌握研究方法。
实证研究法：依据现有的科学理论和实践的需要提出设计。
定性分析法：对研究对象进行“质”的方面的研究，这个方法需要计算的数据较少。
定量分析法：通过具体的数字，使人们对研究对象的认识进一步精确化。
跨学科研究法：运用多学科的理论、方法和成果从整体上对某一课题进行研究。
功能分析法：这是社会科学用来分析社会现象的一种方法，从某一功能出发研究多个方面的影响。
模拟法：通过创设一个与原型相似的模型来间接研究原型某种特性的一种形容方法。
心理学试验论文参考文献
[1].卢存存,杨楠,柯立鑫,刘明,毕志江.社会和心理学干预随机对照试验的报告规范(2018)解读[J].中国循证儿科杂志.2019
[2].王一心.图书馆修补装订破旧图书的心理学意义及试验[J].图书馆论坛.2011
[3].阳仁力,杨贤俊.试验心理学在标志信息量主观评价中的应用浅析[J].黑龙江科技信息.2010
[4].Bellinger,D.C.,Trachtenberg,F.,Barregard,L.,S.,McKinlay,张振.牙科汞合金材料对儿童神经心理学和肾脏功能的影响:随机化临床试验[J].世界核心医学期刊文摘(儿科学分册).2006
[5].Bellinger,D.C.,Trachtenberg,F.,Barregard,L.,S.,McKinlay,周永.牙科银汞合金对儿童神经心理学和肾功能的影响:一项随机临床试验[J].世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册).2006
[6].Jellema,P.,Van,Der,Windt,D.A.W.M.,Van,Der,Horst,H.E.,谢琰臣.是否应针对社会心理学预测因素治疗(亚)急性下背部疼痛:来自全科诊所的多中心随机临床试验[J].世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册).2005
[7].杨奇志.中国股票市场个体投资者行为研究[D].华东师范大学.2005
[8].郑航.高师公共心理学课程增设心理实验教学试验研究[J].青岛大学师范学院学报.2002
[9].韩绍欣.心理学的教学模式及其改革试验[J].心理学探新.1992
[10].马谋超,汪培庄.心理学的方法学探讨——心理的模糊性及模糊统计试验评注[J].心理学报.1985